in

Ads

Advertise Here!
Check out our Media Kit!

Nuclear Street Media Kit

Explore Brokk Equipment - Click Here! 

This Blog

Syndication

Archives

Nuclear Power Industry News

Nuclear Power Industry News is a blog about utilities, companies, suppliers in the nuclear energy market.

Coalition Seeks To Lift Minnesota’s Nuclear Ban

Sensible Energy Solutions for Minnesota, or SESM, wants repeal of the state’s moratorium on constructing nuclear energy facilities

 - Edited by Stephen Heiser -

According to a report by the Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal, a coalition of business, labor and environmental leaders is backing a nonprofit that wants to increase nuclear power generation in Minnesota.  Sensible Energy Solutions for Minnesota (SESM), wants repeal of the state’s moratorium on constructing new nuclear energy facilities.

“As we look ahead, we must put nuclear power — the most sensible and carbon-free base-load electricity source in existence — back on the table as an energy option,” said Minnesota Chamber of Commerce President David Olson, an SESM board member.

SESM members draw attention to applications to build nuclear power plants in other states, and say Minnesota is missing out on an opportunity.

“These plants would supply carbon-free, low-cost, base-load power for the energy grid, as well as offer good-paying jobs during the construction phase and during day-to-day operations,” said Minnesota Pipe Trades Association President Carl Crimmins, also on the organization’s board.

Some of the SESM board members include Cynthia “Cyndi” Lesher, retired president and CEO of Northern States Power Co.; Harry Melander, executive secretary of the St. Paul Building and Construction Trades Council; and Don McMillan, president of the Minnesota Outdoor Heritage Alliance.

The Minnesota Senate surprised many in the state earlier this year when the senate voted 42-24 to repeal the 15-year-old ban. But the measure failed in the Minnesota House in a 76-60 vote.  SESM plans an aggressive grassroots political campaign for the moratorium’s repeal.

Comments

 

J. Contursi said:

This is disturbing news. Recent reports have shown that nuclear generated power is neither cheaper nor safer than other alternative forms of power. Wind energy would be cheaper to produce and run, and there are no safety concerns. There are ample alternatives to back up wind during off-peak hours. We already have the technology! And have these groups thought abought the long-term storage of nuclear waste? The governor had to sign a bill in 2003 extending the waste storage at Prairie Island through 2013--but then what? Why promote a fuel source that will produce contamination and possible catastrophe for our great-grandchildren. These plants also pose a threat of terrorist attacks. And finally, without the government's assistance, these plants could not be built, so our tax dollars will be again used to generate private profits. Who will insure these plants against accident? The government! Nuclear energy is a bad idea from all perspectives: cost, safety, and national security.  

August 14, 2009 8:22 AM
 

Tjalle Vandergraaf said:

It would help J Contursi's cause if she/he would cite the references that show the nuclear generated power is not cheaper than the alternatives. To claim that wind power is cheaper flies in the face of the fact that wind energy is heavily subsidized (www2.macleans.ca/.../ontarios-big-windy-gamble) .  Wind turbines suffer from vibrations, require constant maintenance, and only work when the wind blows.

August 14, 2009 12:03 PM
 

J Kempema said:

If you examine the pie chart the base electricity load 86.9% of all power generated is through coal and nuclear.  I do not forsee an alternative evnergy source which can produce this much base power.  Coal is not cleaner.  Coal is a primary source for mercury and sulfer dioxide in the environment.  Coal produces much more waste in the form of fly ash which contains toxic compounds.  Handling fly ash is itself a problem, there was a settling pond in Knoxville TN which was breached December 22nd 2008 spilling 1.1 billion gallons of water and fly ash toward and into and arm of the Emory River.  Nuclear is the best choice for base power load.  It is the uninformed and fearful public and political representation who are causing the stalemate in handling high level nuclear waste.

August 19, 2009 10:43 AM
Share |

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

About steveheiser

Stephen graduated from Emerson College in January 1989 with a B.F.A. in Professional Writing. He started as an energy writer and editor shortly after. Since then he has been writing and editing energy news for a variety of publications including: Wilson's Business Abstracts, Individual Inc., Newspage, Newsedge, Andover News Network, VerticalNet, PowerOnline, ElectricNet, and Live Power News. In December of 2008, Stephen was hired by industry veteran and Nuclear Street Publisher Cam Abernethy to become Nuclear Street’s Managing Editor. Stephen is a member of AEE, ASME, and NEM.
Copyright (c) 2010 Nuclear Street
Advertise With Us | Terms and Conditions | Privacy | Copyright | Contact Us