in

Ads

Advertise Here!
Check out our Media Kit!

Nuclear Street Media Kit

Explore Brokk Equipment - Click Here! 

This Blog

Syndication

Archives

Nuclear Power Industry News

Nuclear Power Industry News is a blog about utilities, companies, suppliers in the nuclear energy market.

How The Integral Fast Reactor Was killed

Originally Published In The Seeker Blog

 - By Steve Dardenon - 
 
Here’s a concise history of the Integral Fast Reactor, including how Sen. John Kerry orchestrated the killing:

The anti-IFR forces were led by John Kerry. He was the principal speaker and the floor manager of the anti forces in the Senate debate. He spoke at length, with visual aids; he had been well prepared. His arguments against the merits of the IFR were not well informedand many were clearly wrong. But what his presentation lacked in accuracy it made up in emotion. He attacked from many angles, but principally he argued proliferation dangers from civilian nuclear power.

While all serious weapons development programs everywhere in the world have always taken place in huge laboratories, in specialized facilities, behind walls of secrecy, and there has been negligible involvement with civilian nuclear power, it is impossible to argue that there CAN be none. For this reason the IFR processes were specifically designed to further minimize such possibilities, and, if developed, they would have represented a significant advance over the present situation. This did not slow Senator Kerry, as he went through the litany of anti-nuclear assertions, articulately and confidently.

After both sides had their say the vote came, and the pro-IFR forces prevailed. But now the funding bill had to go to conferencea compromise committee of both houses whose job was to consolidate the different versions passed by the two houses into one bill to be sent to the President for signature into law. There was brief hope that IFR development could continue even in the face of the powerful opposition.

But the conference committee, behind the closed doors normal to such meetings, upheld the House position. There was to be no IFR funding. The IFR was dead.

A few weeks later, the mid-term elections swept Republicans into power in Congress. The IFR votes had always been politicized. With some significant exceptions, in fact just enough each year to fund the IFR, the vote had always been along party lines. Had the IFR been able to hang on for a few more weeks its development almost certainly would have gone on to completion.

This is part of the accurate nuclear energy story available from CFRI :

The Center for Reactor Information (CFRI) is a volunteer organization whose membership comprises mainly retired engineers, scientists and researchers in nuclear reactor systems, technologies and safety.

Comments

 

SteveK9 said:

And our conclusion is supposed to be that Kerry is evil and the Republicans are angels?

October 21, 2009 8:55 AM
 

Joe Csabi said:

No!, John Kerry can not be trusted. Have you ever known him to tell the truth?

October 21, 2009 2:13 PM
 

DocForesight said:

Which John Kerry are we talking about here? The proud Vietnam Vet (thank you for your service, which I do not question nor belittle) or the Vietnam Vet who accused his Band of Brothers of all manner of crimes and inhuman atrocities?

Sorry Senator, but you can't have it both ways.

The Democrats have been anti-science when it comes to nuclear energy since the 1970's and remain the roadblock to a pro-development domestic energy policy, all while decrying our "addiction to foreign oil".  It's schizophrenic.

October 21, 2009 5:28 PM
 

Devlin said:

It dilutes the argument when you go to the evils & angels extreme, Steve.

Is it really necessary to go to the extremes?  Why not just conclude that, on this particular issue, Kerry played it wrong on something that shouldn't be played with at all?  While I find the republicans wrong on many issues, I think this is one where they are right.  Are we really afraid that, if we concede that the republicans might be right on one issue, that we will have to take the rest of their beliefs?

October 21, 2009 5:42 PM
Share |

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

About steveheiser

Stephen graduated from Emerson College in January 1989 with a B.F.A. in Professional Writing. He started as an energy writer and editor shortly after. Since then he has been writing and editing energy news for a variety of publications including: Wilson's Business Abstracts, Individual Inc., Newspage, Newsedge, Andover News Network, VerticalNet, PowerOnline, ElectricNet, and Live Power News. In December of 2008, Stephen was hired by industry veteran and Nuclear Street Publisher Cam Abernethy to become Nuclear Street’s Managing Editor. Stephen is a member of AEE, ASME, and NEM.
Copyright (c) 2010 Nuclear Street
Advertise With Us | Terms and Conditions | Privacy | Copyright | Contact Us